 | | Canada | 12/02/2008 |
| Topics: Regulatory Reform Programs | Regulatory Reform Programs / International | Regulatory Tools | Regulatory Tools / Risk Analysis | Regulatory Tools / Regulatory Choice | Regulatory Tools / Impact Assessment | Public Engagement | Public Engagement / E-Democracy | Public Engagement / Transparency | Public Engagement / Direct Democracy | Regulatory Governance | Market Regulation | Market Regulation / Goods | Market Regulation / Services | Market Regulation / International Trade | Monitoring Regulatory Quality / Administrative Costs | Service Delivery - Enforcement | Service Delivery - Enforcement / E-Government | Service Delivery - Enforcement / Regulatory Agencies | Service Delivery - Enforcement / Local Authorities | Strategic Policy Making | Strategic Policy Making / Competence | Strategic Policy Making / Communication | Strategic Policy Making / Implementation CapacityPopular Tags: benefits | aging | workforce transition | training | regulatory | enforcement |
| On August 21, 2007, Leaders of Canada, Mexico and the United States released the Regulatory Cooperation Framework (RCF), seeking to improve trilateral regulatory cooperation to (1) lower costs for North American businesses, producers, governments and consumers; (2) maximize trade in goods and services across our borders; and (3) protect health, safety, and the environment. | | 11/14/2008 |
| Topics: Regulatory Reform Programs | Regulatory Reform Programs / International | Regulatory Governance | Regulatory Governance / Oversight Bodies | Market Regulation | Market Regulation / Goods | Market Regulation / Services | Market Regulation / International TradePopular Tags: performance-based regulation | non-regulatory options | RCF | plain language | duplicative requirements | regulatory decision-making | regulatory need | market economy | Canada | USA | Mexico | market failures | adverse impact | links | transparency | Common Regulatory Principles | net benefits | regulatory impact analyses |
| Electronic rulemaking, or “e-rulemaking,” began in the federal government within individual agencies in the mid-to-late 1990s, but current government-wide initiatives can be traced to both congressional and presidential sources. For example, the E-Government Act of 2002 requires federal agencies... | | 03/17/2009 |
| Topics: Regulatory Reform Programs | Regulatory Reform Programs / National | Public Engagement | Public Engagement / E-Democracy | Public Engagement / Transparency | Service Delivery - Enforcement | Service Delivery - Enforcement / E-GovernmentPopular Tags: OMB | Congress | public participation | FDMS | Functionality | costs | e-rulemaking | e-Government | USA | Capabilities | benefits | Navigability | Legislative-Executive Branch Conflict | Regulations.gov |
| IRRC 07, Keynote Speech by Aart De Geus: Governments have a responsibility to review their own regulations and regulatory structures and processes, to ensure that they promote, efficiently and effectively, the economic and social well-being of their people. We now have a range of tools and institutional approaches that can serve to promote change. These new foundations for responsible regulation are still young, and will mature with time in many countries. | | 02/24/2009 |
| Topics: Regulatory Reform Programs | Regulatory ToolsPopular Tags: Regulatory Reform | Benefits of Reform | Challenges | Implementing Regulatory Reform |
| This is the fifth annual report examining how regulatory impact assessments (RIAs) work in practice and whether they follow the Government’s own guidelines. The conclusion from this year’s review of RIA practice is that little has changed and therefore nor have most of our recommendations (below). In order not to weary readers with repetition, we consider the problems within a wider context... | | 03/17/2009 |
| Topics: Regulatory Reform Programs | Regulatory Reform Programs / National | Regulatory Governance | Regulatory Governance / Oversight Bodies | Regulatory Governance / Scrutiny (e.g. Watchdogs) | Market Regulation | Monitoring Regulatory QualityPopular Tags: business | UK | impact assessments | benefits | EU legislation | Statutory Instruments | RIA |
| IRRC 08, Session 2.1: Presentation of Stephen Rimmer
Australia’s RIA processes - Benefits of regulatory reform? - Costs of Australia’s RIA systems - Measuring the impacts of RIA systems - RIA a worthwhile investment? | Australia | 11/25/2008 |
| Topics: Regulatory Reform Programs | Regulatory Tools / Impact Assessment | Monitoring Regulatory QualityPopular Tags: Australia | regulatory impact assessment | regulatory reform | benefits | costs | RIA |
Back to Topinfo
built BS-IRR 1409 at ${build.lastSourceUpdate}